On Sep 13, 1:20 am, miranda howe <***@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 12, 5:07 am, Sanity <sanity-***@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 12, 2:06 am, miranda howe <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 11, 2:30 pm, Pat Easterling <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 11, 1:26 pm, "***@yahoo.com"
>
> > > > <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Sep 10, 6:15 pm, "huhie" <***@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Connie" <***@cox.net> wrote in message
>
> > > > > >news:a5526eb5-7e1c-49a6-8c2a-***@x32g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > On Sep 9, 4:13 pm, "huhie" <***@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds (hint => LSD )- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_in_the_Sky_with_Diamonds
>
> > > > > > Julian's drawing
> > > > > > Julian's drawing Lucy in the Sky With DiamondsLennon's inspiration for
> > > > > > the song came when his son, Julian, showed him a nursery school
> > > > > > drawing he called "Lucy - in the sky with diamonds", depicting his
> > > > > > classmate, Lucy O'Donnell. Julian said, "I don't know why I called it
> > > > > > that or why it stood out from all my other drawings, but I obviously
> > > > > > had an affection for Lucy at that age. I used to show dad everything
> > > > > > I'd built or painted at school, and this one sparked off the idea..."
> > > > > > Lucy Vodden née O'Donnell, in a BBC radio interview in 2007, said, "I
> > > > > > remember Julian and I both doing pictures on a double-sided easel,
> > > > > > throwing paint at each other, much to the horror of the classroom
> > > > > > attendant... Julian had painted a picture and on that particular day
> > > > > > his father turned up with the chauffeur to pick him up from school."
> > > > > > Lennon said he was surprised at the idea that the song title was a
> > > > > > hidden reference to LSD.
>
> > > > > > “ It was purely unconscious that it came out to be LSD. Until someone
> > > > > > pointed it out, I never even thought of it. I mean, who would ever
> > > > > > bother to look at initials of a title? It's not an acid song. The
> > > > > > imagery was Alice in the boat. ”
>
> > > > > > Vodden died of the immune system disease lupus in 2009.
>
> > > > > > nice story, **but not true at all.**
>
> > > > > > Everyone over 50 knows that.
>
> > > > > its sure is nice toi not be "everybody"....
>
> > > > I know that this is an un-moderated forum, for some good reasons (I
> > > > guess), but I sure wish it had the feature "Ignore posts by xxx" so I
> > > > could just not have to wade through some posters let us say, odd
> > > > thoughts. Though on the other hand, responses such as M's have been
> > > > good to read, and I guess unless those who'd I judge to be confused
> > > > (at a lower level than my confusion level) posted, I'd never have....
>
> > > Thanks! I just love writing. I love truth. I love fresh approaches
> > > that dismantle and heal cliche and stereotype. And I've been there in
> > > stupidville condemning certain people and believing I was superior.
> > > And I bless the day I was shown the light and stopped thinking in
> > > boxes. And I committed to never forget the ins and outs of it and
> > > committed to be able to write about it. love, miranda- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Ahem: Your 'box' is a whole lot bigger than it used to be, as is mine,
> > but I don't think either of us or anyone else here can yet righteously
> > claim knowledge of "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
> > truth" either.
>
> > That we [you, I, and everyone else who loves the truth] do our best is
> > good enough for me, and if God wants better than our best,
> > well....... I am still making mistakes, and learning from them. :^)
>
> That isn't for one moment what I was saying. Check it out: I'm
> exactly in this thread talking about the transcendental mind that,
> while observing and even utilizing "boxes" (sic: linear, binary, black-
> and-white, compartmentalized thought patterns), one isn't emotionally
> or spiritually or intellectually searching for, hanging onto or
> mourning absolutes. Fuck absolutes. I surrender.
>
> I'm never competing. I'm just not into right or wrong. I find the
> concept of winning or losing to be the ridiculous and tragic uber
> paradigm. The bible gitgo is that wretched shit. "Here's this
> gorgeous garden my beautiful children. Now DON'T." Well fuck me!
> Ready set go for misery. Misery artificially imposed. I mean as if
> this world of microbes, earthquakes, precipices, fangs, tusks, claws,
> volcanoes, gravity bound tree branches, breach births, tornadoes,
> flood, poisons and old age needs humans sitting around coming up with
> more ways and reasons to hurt, maim and kill each other and just
> generally impose more limits. Terrible, terrible. Ultimately, it gets
> skyscrapers crashed into and countries invaded with a half million
> citizens murdered. That's truth.
>
> You see, in advanced math everything is its own opposite. So positive
> two equals negative two. So they cancel each other out. So what do
> you got then? Nothing. Well so the minute you bring up something as
> being right or wrong you bring up the opposite by implication. And
> you got nothing. What I mean by that in terms of human reality is
> that wrong and right and the scale of good better best is just an
> illusion. Right and wrong are just made up. They have definite
> usefulness like saying "I'll do better" when someone questions your
> dysfunctional behavior, and that's genuinely lovely and true when you
> endeavor to be mindful then.
>
> But to set out some sort of grid of good and bad and round up every
> act and every actor in boxes accordingly is just tragic. Is
> crippling; is illness; is death. Yet it's as common as rain where it
> rains or lack of rain where there's drought. People set up these
> patterns out of fear and greed. If I can yell about John Lennon as a
> heroin addict then by implication I'm better than he was. If
> I negate any of John Lennon's work because he was an addict then it's
> ok I've never produced anything. If I condemn people who disagree
> with me as very bad then I must be very good. And never mind the
> subject matter. Ideas wither and die in such a climate.
>
> So of course I don't know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but
> the truth. Or do I? Hmmm. Upon reflection maybe I do. And so do
> you. And so does everyone here. I had an epiphany in '89. And no.
> It's not just a bigger box. I saw the light. Oh, yeah, it's an
> ongoing thing. No. I'm not god. Well... maybe. So's huhie. He she
> it is just sleeping. We are each just masks of the god head. The
> truth contains both good and bad. But maybe I'm wrong.
> Love, Miranda- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I think we're on the same page. :^) I used to strive for
perfection, until I realized it was too time consuming, so now I
strive for excellence. The Tao that can be talked about is not the
Eternal Tao, etc.
Lovin' you back, Sanity